RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04196

N						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reentry code (RE) of 2X (First-term, second-term or career 
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed 
to allow reentry in the military.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The applicant does not make any contentions.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 
10 May 11.

According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment 
Program Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air 
Force Reserve, dated 28 Mar 13, his commander denied his 
reenlistment because the applicant had multiple disciplinary 
infractions during his enlistment and under the current 
conditions is not recommended for reenlistment.  The applicant 
was given a Letter of Counseling for failure to obey an order, a 
Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for a failed physical assessment (FA), 
and received an Article 15 for being derelict in the performance 
of his duties.  

The applicant did not appeal this decision.

On 31 May 13, the applicant was discharged with an honorable 
characterization of service and was credited with 2 years, and 
21 days of active service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  On 28 Mar 13, the applicant's 
commander non­selected him for reenlistment on an AF Form 418, 
the applicant acknowledged non-selection and rendered his 
intent not to appeal the decision on 28 Mar 13.  In accordance 
with (IAW) AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders 
have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection 
authority.  The SRP considers the members Enlisted Performance 
Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable Information from any 
substantiated source, the airman's willingness to comply with 
Air Force standards and/or the airman's ability (or lack of) to 
meet required training and duty performance levels.  It is clear 
the applicant's commander had justification for denial of 
reenlistment based on the information in the remarks section of 
the AF Form 418.  The applicant does not provide any proof of 
an error or injustice in reference to his RE code.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In his response, the applicant states he regrets the decisions 
he made when he was in the military.  The short career he had in 
the military did not properly represent the kind of person he 
is.  He is unable to take back his poor decisions, but if given 
a second chance he would use this opportunity to prove himself 
redeemable.  

A complete copy of the applicant’s response, with attachment is 
at Exhibit E.  


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission, including his 
rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however, 
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale 
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-04196 in Executive Session on 11 Jun 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-04196 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Oct 14.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 20 Nov 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Feb 15.
	Exhibit E.  Applicant Rebuttal, not dated.